Monday, January 14, 2013

Industrial/Organizational Psychology Worksheet


Industrial/Organizational Psychology Worksheet
The purpose of this assignment is to examine the fundamental concepts of the field of industrial/organizational psychology. 

1.     Describe the evolution of the field of industrial/organizational psychology.

According to Spector (2012) “I/O psychology is an eclectic field that has borrowed concepts, ideas, techniques, and theories from many other disciplines.” (p. 5). Industrial and organizational psychology, or something similar can be traced back to the studies of European scientist Herman von Helmholtz (1821-1894). He expanded on the concept of conservation of human energy to determine if the energy levels in the present labor force were sufficient to the increasing demands of the industrial revolution (Koppes, & Pickren (n.d). English philosopher John Locke (1632-1704) surmised that knowledge begins with the individual’s sensory experience. He further believed that logical thinking combined with sensory experience was superior to religion as a basis for developing a civil society (Koppes, & Pickren, n.d.). Another philosopher, Karl Marx (1818-1883) argued that freedom defined what it is to be human. He believed that a struggle for freedom existed in a capitalist system because the system attempted to develop a false sense of consciousness or belief of freedom in workers (Koppes, & Picken, n.d.). Emil Kraeplin (1856-1926) performed studies focused on work performance. He surmised that few differences between physical and mental performance existed. He believed that workers experienced fatigue in mental and physical performance in similar ways by interpreting work curve results that showed declines in production over time, and that fatigue could be reduced over time through practice and training (Koppes, & Pickren, n.d.).
Experimental psychology is considered to play a major role in the development of I/O psychology, and provided the principles and techniques (Spector, 2012). At the time, several psychologists were attempting to apply psychological theory to the business sector using techniques like psychological testing (Spector, 2012). In the United States, early work in I/O psychology focused on issues concerning employee performance and organizational efficiency, but in the United Kingdom the focus was directed more toward the health and fatigue of employees (Spector, 2012). Pioneering the I/O psychology movement in the United States were two experimental psychologists; Hugo Munsterberg (1863-1916), and Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955). Their early work placed emphasis on the application of psychology to help solve organizational problems (Spector, 2012). Both Munsterberg and Scott were also credited for writing the first books related to I/O psychology: The Theory of Advertising by Scott (1903), and Psychology and Industrial Efficiency by Munsterberg (1913).  During World War I both the United States and United Kingdom began implementing I/O psychology in response to military demand on both the private and government sectors (Spector, 2012). After World War I, I/O psychology continued to expand into most of the areas of application it is used for today (Spector, 2012).




2.     Explain why industrial/organizational psychology should be considered a science.  Include an explanation of how descriptive and inferential statistics are used in I/O research.

According to Spector (2012) “I/O psychologists do many different jobs in a wide variety of settings.” (p. 6). Psychologists that focus on I/o psychology are often divided between the areas of practice and scientific research. Because the practice of I/O psychology in an organization setting is based on research produced by scientific data, I/O psychology is dependent on scientific research (Spector, 2012). Although there are two distinct classifications of I/O psychology, those who specialize in the fiend are more likely to perform work that crosses both sectors. One major difference is setting. Most research is performed in college or university settings where I/O psychologists are employed as professors. Most practical I/O psychology is applied to consulting firms, government, private sector organizations, and military (Spector, 2012). I/O psychology can be considered a science because research is one of the primary activities performed by I/O psychologists (Spector, 2012). One of the major contributions that researchers have provided to I/O psychology is the development of procedures used to select and train employees (Spector, 2012). Research is also used to solve problems that an organization may be experiencing. These problems can range from employee turnover, employee theft, and attitude in the workplace (Spector, 2012). Although most research data is published in major publications or journals produced by associations, and private entities, practitioners can get access to research data by attending annual conferences (Spector, 2012).

I/O psychologists use various research methods that include the basic methods, procedures, techniques, and tools used to conduct empirical research (SOIP, 2013). These basic techniques of scientific method, inductive and deductive reasoning, development of research questions, hypothesis creation, design and implementation of studies, and the nature and definition of constructs form the basis the general areas of I/O psychology (Spector, 2012). I/O psychologists also use various statistical techniques to analyze the data that empirical research produces (Spector, 2012). This process includes both inferential and descriptive statistical methods, and parametric and nonparametric methods. This requires the use of specific competencies, and issues and techniques that encompass estimation of central tendencies, estimates of variability, sampling and distributions, and estimates of point and interval (Spector, 2012).




3.     Discuss the influence industrial/organization psychology has had on organizations. Provide examples.

During the periods between World War I and World War II American organizations started employing the services of I/O psychologists to address employee problems primarily related to productivity. During this same time, I/O psychology in the United Kingdom was also advancing studies on improving efficiency and working conditions for British workers (Spector, 2012). This time period saw the development of I/O psychology consulting firms, with the first recognized firm called the American Company Psychological Corporation being formed by James McKeen Cattell (1860-1944) in 1921 (Spector, 2012). Another important milestone in I/O psychology during this time was the Hawthorn studies that were conducted by over a 10-year span at the Western Electric Company (Spector, 2012). The Hawthorn studies originally focused on environmental aspects of the workplace, which included how brightness of lights, and issues like humidity influenced worker productivity (Franke, & Kaul, 1978 as cited in Clark, 1995). The studies evolved into the psychological aspects of employee performance and included issues like employee breaks, managerial leadership, group influences, and working hours (Franke, & Kaul, 1978 as cited in Clark, 1995).  Two major factors that helped shape the field of I/O psychology in the United States were the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the Americans With Disabilities Act in 1990 (Spector, 2012). Although these two major events helped shape the field of I/O psychology, research from the field has produced valuable information that improved the standards of the workplace, which resulted in improvements in employee satisfaction and productivity through comprehensive training programs, and policies developed to enhance the work environment (Spector, 2012).







References

Clark, D. (1995). Hawthorn Effect. Retrieved from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/history/hawthorne.html
Koppes, L. & Pickren, W. (n.d.). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Retrieved from http://uwf.edu/skass/orgpsy_files/articles/Historical%20perspectives1.pdf
SIOP. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/history/crsppp.aspx
Spector, P. E. (2012). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Introduction to Human Personality








Introduction to Human Personality

            When people consider human personality it is common to ask if personality is the root cause of why people behave the way they do, and why people react to situations the way they do. Other questions researchers seek to answer is whether or not an individual has a conscious choice in how his or her personality is formed, and why do people have such varying personality traits (Feist, & Feist, 2009). Many of the questions researchers face today regarding human personality have been around for centuries. Until recently, philosophers, theologians, and psychologists have made very little progress in answering some of the most basic questions about human personality (Feist, & Feist). Renowned psychologist Sigmund Freud (1856-1939) began the process of listening to patients so he could determine what hidden conflicts were causing the patient’s symptoms. Freud’s method, which started out as a minor investigative tool, became more of a scientific method that allowed him to formulate hypothesis and verify them against clinical experience, which eventually led him to evolve the first modern theory of human personality (Feist, & Feist).
            Following Freud’s work psychologists have evolved the study of personality but have continued to fail to develop a singular definition of what human personality is. According to Feist, and Feist (2009), “Indeed, they evolved unique and vital theories because they lacked agreement as the nature of humanity, and because each saw personality from an individual reference point” (p. 3). Th individual reference points of personality theorists were developed based on the researcher’s own personal background, geographical, religious experiences, and clinical backgrounds. Some theorists have attempted to develop comprehensive theories about personality, and some simply focused on various aspects of human personality development (Feist, & Feist, 2009). Although there are various views of human personality, there is a belief that human personality is regarded as a pattern of “relatively permanent traits and unique characteristics that give both consistency and individuality to a person’s behavior” (Feist, & Feist, 2009, p. 4).
Personality
            Individual traits are a contributing factor in an individual’s behavior, the consistency of the behavior, and stability of behavior in conjunction with various situations (Feist, & Feist, 2009). Traits are regarded as being more unique to an individual. Traits can also be regarded as a common factor in groups of people, and in some cases, shared by an entire species (Feist, & Feist). In cases of commonality of groups or species, these traits will display a different pattern on an individual basis. Although people may exhibit similar traits, each person has variations in personality based on factors like religious beliefs, cultural norms, and upbringing. Individuals also exhibit variations in characteristics unique to the individual. These characteristics include various attributes like temperament, physique, and intelligence level (Feist, & Feist).
The Study of Personality
            The study of personalities is as important to psychology as studying thoughts, emotions, and behavior (allPsych, 2003). Psychological study of human behavior requires that researchers observe behavior and objectively report the behavior appropriately. Researchers must be able to explain why the person behaved a in the manner observed (AllPsych).  Once a particular behavior is observed and explained researchers can make educated predictions of the behavior’s reoccurrence, and develop methods to correct the behavior (AllPsych). As with the study of behavior, researchers perform similar experiments to develop personality theories.
The goal of personality research is to understand the basic personality traits, and to determine if individual traits can be groups into categories or clusters (AllPsych, 2003). Other questions personality theorists try to answer is how personality traits develop, and what roles do biological and environmental influences affect the individual’s personality (AllPsych). This leads researchers to determine if knowledge of personality can be used to make various predictions, and what assessment devices will be effective in studying personality (AllPsych). Can researchers discover an effective method to alter an individual’s personality, and under what circumstances should personality modification be applied (AllPsych).
            Although the basics of psychological study apply to how clinicians and researchers study various aspects of human personalities, there is no singular form of personality theory (Feist, & Feist, 2009). Biological theory suggests that genetics are responsible for individual personality. Researchers focused on the study of heredity surmise that a link between an individual’s personality and genetics (Feist, & Feist). In contrast to biological theorists, behavioral theorists suggest that individual personalities are a result of the individual’s interaction with his or her environment, but do not place credence in accounting for personal thoughts and emotions (Feist, & Feist). Heavily influenced by Sigmund Freud (1856-1939), psychodynamic theory suggests that the unconscious mind and childhood experiences are major influences on individual personality development (AllPsych, 2003).
Factors of Personality
There are numerous factors that influence an individual’s personality. Henriques (2012) believes there are five characteristic adaptational systems that influence personality. Henriques suggests that individual habits correspond to basic levels of mental processing, and initiated by the presence of specific environmental cues, associations, and consequences (Henriques, 2012). The second system is the experiential system, which refers to an individual’s non-verbal feelings, images, and sensory aspects of human life (Henriques). The relational system refers to an individual’s social motivations and feelings in relation to internal working models, and self schema that influences an individual’s social relationships, and personal exchanges (Henriques). The defensive system in related to how an individual manages his or her actions, feelings, and thoughts. The defensive system also influences the individual’s ability to cope with distressing thoughts and experiences he or she may encounter (Henriques). The last component is the justification system that refers to how an individual verbalizes his or her beliefs and values, and how the individual develops of meaningful worldview (Henriques).

Conclusion

            Although the scientific community cannot decide on a specific system regarding personality theory, it is obvious that an individual’s personality is a major factor in how he or she lives daily life. Personality traits can determine how an individual reacts in stressful situations, or why he or she has a specific food item for lunch, and what time he or she eats lunch. An individual develops personality traits based on environmental, sociocultural, and personal experiences he or she has starting from childhood, and continues through adult life. Understanding personality can help researchers understand individual behaviors, and can allow researchers to predict an individual’s behavior.




References

Sunday, January 13, 2013

Case Study of Social Phobia


Case Study Analysis of Dave

Dave is a young adult male in college, and suffers from social phobia. This condition usually begins during the individual’s early years, and is represented by symptoms that include a fear of being judged by other people, and being embarrassed in public situations (National Institute of Mental Health, n.d.). Dave also displays symptoms related to obsessive-compulsive disorder, and control issues.

Social Phobia

According to the National Institute of Mental Health (n.d.) “people with social phobia are afraid of doing common things in front of other people” (para. 2). Examples of social phobia include the fear of eating or drinking in front of others, or going to public events where the individual perceives a potential exposure to embarrassment (National Institute of Mental Health, n.d.).  Symptoms of social phobia range based on individual experiences. Some people will display symptoms during certain situations, whereas other people will experience symptoms under any social or public situation (National Institute of Mental Health, n.d.). Individuals suffering from social phobia are normally aware that their fears are over-exaggerated: however, the individual is not able to control his or her fear (National Institute of Mental Health, n.d.).
Social phobia is recognized as a treatable debilitating psychiatric condition that often remains undetected and untreated. Symptoms are likely to include blushing of the skin, and muscle twitching (Franklin, 1991). Social phobias may be as minor as a treatable fear of social interactions, or may include more serious conditions like agoraphobia that result on possible severe panic attacks that render a the individual unable to leave his or her perceived safe environment (Franklin, 1991).

Patient History

The patient’s case study indicates that his symptoms started within the last year. His interview reflects that he suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder, and control issues (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). The patient believes that he always has to be perfect and in control of all situations he is associated with. His current condition has elevated his stress and anxiety levels to a point of being completely uncomfortable around other people (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). The patient’s interview indicates that his brother suffers from anxiety disorder resulting from family issues, and that his brother’s disorder has become a primary focus of the family dynamic (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Dave believes that his brother’s problems have produced a situation where he is forced to take on a stronger role in the family, and that his family, especially his father, would not be able to contend with him having a mental disorder as well. Various test results indicate that the patient does not display any severe impairments associated with psychotic disorders; however, the test results are based on predictions that the patient has accurately and honestly answered the questionnaire (Hansell, & Damour, 2008).

Components of Dave’s phobia

The primary component of the patient’s condition is the fear of not being in control, and the reinforcement of anxiety within his family. Dave displays a tendency to feel extreme shame and embarrassment, and comparing himself to family members and peers. Further documentation indicates that the patient suffers from anxiety, and insecurity. He has a lack in self confidence, but is conventional thinking and controlled (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Further documentation indicates that the patient shows a strong belief that he is less attractive and inferior to others around him. His anxiety levels became elevated when he was exposed to social situations, and that he compared himself to his friends, and family members in an unfavorable position (Hansell, & Damour, 2008).

Conclusion

The assessment of the patient indicates that he suffers from a persistent, irrational fear of social situations that results in his attempts to avoid any social interaction with his peers. The classification of social phobia is important to the development of a treatment regimen focusing on a combination of behavioral, cognitive, psychodynamic, and family influences to help the patient overcome his fears of inadequacy, and help alleviate the extreme symptoms of fear when involved in social situations. Social phobia affects people on different levels of extremity. Some people may display symptoms under certain situation, whereas other people will display symptoms in all social interactions. Understanding the individual underlying factors that result in individual diagnosis helps medical professionals determine the proper course of treatment best suited for the individual situation.



References
Franklin, R. S. (1991). Social phobia. Psychiatric Annals, 21(6), 349-353. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/894193799?accountid=35812
Hansell, J. & Damour, L. (2008). Abnormal psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.



Monday, January 7, 2013

Historical Perspectives of Abnormal Psychology


Historical Perspectives of abnormal Psychology

Abnormal psychology is a model of psychological study of the abnormal human behavior. Clinical applications focus on defining, classifying, explaining, and providing clinically sound treatments for the many illnesses that fall under the abnormal behavior classification (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Considered a young science, abnormal psychology has evolved over the past 100 years to outline six basic concepts that provide researchers with a relatively more accurate definition of study. Understanding modern-day theories of abnormal psychology requires consideration of the origins, theoretical models, and evolution related directly to abnormal behavior.

The Origins of Abnormal Psychology

One major difficulty in studying the origins and continuation of abnormal psychology is the definition of what is and is not abnormal behavior (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Because behavior is a product of various influences like cultural differences, and societal views, researchers must  account for these differences, and look at past behavior of an individual (Feist, & Feist, 2009). Abnormal behavior in humans has been recorded as far back as biblical times. These early behavioral abnormalities included descriptions of behavior similar to modern day cases of schizophrenia and depression (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). One of the earliest recorded explanations for abnormal behavior in early cultures was a condition known as animism (Esper, 1964 as cited by Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Because early humans regarded many issues as acts of the spirit world, a person suffering from mental illness would be considered to be possessed by the devil or malevolent spirits (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Treatments for individuals deemed possessed could include a procedure where holes were drilled into the patient’s skull to release the possessing spirit; a process known as trephination. Another recorded method of treatment associated with animism is exorcism, or the ritualistic practice of religious authorities used to cast out the evil sprits responsible for the individual’s abnormal behavior (Selling, 1940; Taylor, 1958 as cited in Hansell, & Damour, 2008).
Another major influence on the origins of abnormal psychology is connected to early Greek biological theories. Hippocrates theorized that diseases, including mental abnormalities were the result of an imbalance of four fluids believed to circulate through the human body (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Treatments were designed to return the proper balance of these fluids, and included dietary and behavioral modifications. Hysteria was another biological theory associated with abnormal psychology developed by Greek physicians based on their own medical observations (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). The theory of hysteria involves the development of symptoms related to neurological damage form injury or disease (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Common symptoms associated with hysteria included confusion, loss of sensation, paralysis, and physical pain or ailments (Hansell, & Damour, 2008).

Defining Normal and Abnormal Behavior

One major problem that faces researchers is the definition and classification of abnormal behavior. According to Hansell, & Damour (2008) “Explanatory paradigms for mental illness have shifted back and forth over many centuries among the spiritual, biological, and the psychological realms” (p. 31). The different theoretical approaches to abnormal psychology advance and change over time based on cultural and societal changes, and explanations of abnormal psychology depend on relation to cultural and historical context, and scientific progress (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Thomas Kuhn (1922-1996) surmised that some philosophical views of scientific progress resulted from a series of radical paradigm shifts, and nota gradual accumulation of scientific knowledge associated to scientific advances (Hansell, & Damour, 2008).
Defining and classifying abnormal behavior requires an understanding of what is expected and acceptable behavior based on cultural, societal, and individual norms (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Determining the point where an individual’s behavior deviates from these norms and becomes abnormal is challenging at best. Using the theory of relativism one could conclude that normalcy and abnormality is defined as the relative parameter of cultural and societal behavior during a specific period of human evolution (hansell, & Damour, 2008). To aid researchers in the development of these definitions, six core concepts were developed. These core concepts include contextual importance, continuum between abnormal and normal behavior,   consideration of cultural and historical relativism, understanding benefits and drawbacks of diagnosis, the understanding of causality, and the importance of mind/body connections (Hansell, & Damour, 2008).

The Evolution of Abnormal Behavior

Referenced earlier were the theoretical models of spirituality and early biology. Hippocrates theory that mental illness was a result of a fluid imbalance in the body, although flawed, were a significant contribution to modern-day medical thinking (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). His theories influences other physicians of his time to move away from spiritual beliefs, and rely on medical observations to diagnose mental illness. As science progressed, these early biological theories inspired new thinking in the field psychology (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). In the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries abnormal behavior was still considered by many to be related to demonic possession (AllPsych Online, 2003). Treatments of mentally ill people during this time included various forms of torture designed to drive out the demons possessing the individual (AllPsych Online, 2003). Unfortunately, most of these methods of torture failed in curing the individual, and in many cases the individual would be exiled or executed (AllPsych Online, 2003).
Views of mental illness started to shift by the eighteenth century, and abnormal behavior started to be viewed as an illness rather than demonic influence (AllPsych Online, 2003). During this period patients suffering from mental illness were moved from the torturous environment of dungeons and placed in asylums that focused on medical forms of treatment (AllPsych Online, 2003). In the early twentieth century somatogenic and psychogenic theories emerged. Somatogenic theory suggested that abnormal behavior was directly related to physiological factors, whereas psychogenic theory suggests that the root causes of abnormal behavior were psychological in nature. Modern-day models of abnormal psychology are influenced primarily by evolved versions of these early medical models (AllPsych Online, 2003).

Model Comparison

Theoretical models associated with abnormal behavior point to the importance of therapeutic relationships involved in the treatment process. While all these models converge and intersect at points, each explains causality from different perspectives (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Psychosocial models explain how individuals process internal conflicting processes between the conscious and unconscious combined with environmental interactions. It emphasizes the importance of social relationships, immediate environments, internal conflicts, concerns, and memories in relation to individual behavior (Hansell, & damour, 2008). Biological and medical theories identify biological and physical associations to mental diseases and dysfunctions. It factors the contributions of biochemical and physical body functions, especially within the brain, as important factors related to understanding abnormal overt behavior and unobservable deviant behavior (Hansell, & Damour, 2008). Sociocultural theory suggests that social, cultural, and familial environments influence individual mental dysfunction and illness, and that environmental stressors influence and enhance abnormal behavior.
In modern-day research clinicians use the DSM-IV as the primary tool to diagnose various mental disorders by using a multidimensional approach to diagnosing mental dysfunction (AllPsych Online, 2003). The five primary dimensions of the DSM-IVIV are divided up into clinical syndromes, or axis I, developmental and personality disorders, or axis II, physical conditions, or axis III, severity of psychosocial stressors, or axis IV, and highest level of functioning, or axis V (AllPsych Online, 2003). The DSM-IV also identifies 15 general areas of adult mental illness (AllPsych Online, 2003).

Conclusion

The science of abnormal psychology is young and filled with a rich history of theoretical approaches ranging from early animistic approaches to the modern technology of medical science. Psychology has continued to evolve theoretical approaches based on constantly evolving cultural and societal views, and advancements in technology. Every theoretical approach focused on some measure of reliving individuals of the discomfort and dysfunction associated with abnormal behavior, and with through various advancements like the DSM-IV new progressions in diagnosis and treatments are discovered.



References
 AllPsych Online. (2003). Psychology 101. Retrieved from http://allpsych.com/psychology101/psychopathology.html
Feist, J., & Feist, G. (2009) Theories of Personality (7th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill
Hansell, J., & Damour, L. (2008). Abnormal Psychology (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.